• Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • TESTIMONIALS
  • BLOG
  • ARTICLES
Call us: 800-349-0127
Blizzard Law PLLC
  • Home
  • Our Firm ▼
    • Attorneys
    • Testimonials
  • Practice Areas ▼
    • ◂ Personal Injury
      • 18-Wheeler Accidents
      • First Responders Deer Park Fire Injuries
      • Industrial Accidents
      • Maritime Accidents
      • Wrongful Death
      • Workplace Injuries
    • ◂ Dangerous Drugs
      • ◂ Birth Defect Litigation
        • Celexa
        • Lexapro
      • Talcum Powder
      • Valsartan
    • ◂ Defective Devices
      • CPAP Recall Cancer Lawsuit
      • Hernia Mesh
      • IVC Filters
      • JUUL and Vaping Lawsuits
      • Minimally Invasive Brain Surgery
      • Transvaginal Mesh
    • ◂ Sexual Assault
      • USC OBGYN Assault
      • Sexual Assault Resources
    • ◂ Human Trafficking
      • Human Trafficking Resources
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Menu Menu

Phillips Cannot Seem to Get its Sleep Apnea Recall Right

April 14, 2022/in Defective Devices /by damg

A company that has issued a product recall already has enough legal risk from the fact that they may have sold a defective product that injured scores of people. When they issue recall instructions, they should certainly be correct. They are only compounding their legal issues if they cannot properly execute their own recall. That is exactly what has happened to Phillips Respironics, as it has been criticized by the Food and Drug Administration for bungling its own product recall.

Phillips CPAP and BiPAP Users Were Injured by Defective Devices

Phillips was forced to recall hundreds of thousands of devices used to treat obstructive sleep apnea. The problem was that Phillips used a piece of foam to insulate against noise when the device was placed on a flat surface, such as a nightstand. For many users, this foam degraded over time, and the particles made their way into the lungs of patients using the machine. The polyurethane foam contains numerous toxins that patients should not be inhaling. Some patients suffered from the following side effects:

  • Headaches
  • Airway irritation
  • Permanent lung damages
  • More serious life-threatening injuries that come from breathing in particles of toxic foam
  • Cancer-causing effects from inhaling chemicals

The Repair Kit Provided Was No Safer than the Existing Defective Device

Phillips’ recall solution provided to customers seemed to be a quick fix designed to move as much of the problem as it could out of its own hands and into the consumer’s. The company provided a silicone foam repair kit to patients for them to remove the damaged foam from their CPAP machine and replace it themselves. Theoretically, this may have worked if the silicone substance itself were safe. However, this recall was an instance in which Phillips was replacing one defective solution with another.

The FDA was clearly alarmed by the fact that Phillips apparently knew of the degradation problem with its sound abatement foam for years but kept selling the product. The FDA decided to take a more active and hands-on approach to the recall, conducting its own investigation through site visits. The agency wanted to learn more about what happened.

The FDA Is Learning the True Scope of the Problem

One visit that the FDA made was to the manufacturing plant where the silicone insert was being made. During this visit, the FDA learned that the silicone-based foam might be no safer than the polyurethane foam that sickened and injured scores of patients.

The specific problem was that the silicone insert failed one key safety test of its own. This test revealed that the silicone insert could release its own “chemicals of concern” that patients could inhale in their sleep. These are volatile organic compounds that can sicken patients.

Phillips had conducted its own testing of the silicone inserts, and its results did not have similar findings. As a result, the FDA has ordered Phillips to conduct independent third-party testing on the safety of the silicone inserts. In the meantime, the FDA is not recommending that patients discontinue their use of the machine, given the critical (and potentially life-saving role) that these CPAP machines perform.

Patients are not left with any alternatives that have been tested and confirmed to be safe. It would be extremely dangerous for a patient with obstructive sleep apnea to stop using a sleep apnea machine altogether. Yet Phillips’ mishandling of the recall and providing a solution that is still potentially dangerous prolongs the problem for patients and makes it worse.

The FDA Has Been Very Critical Of Phillips

The FDA has specifically noted that Phillips’ efforts to notify its customers of the recall to date have been “inadequate.” In March 2022, the FDA took two actions that showed its frustration with Phillips:

  • On March 10, 2022, the FDA issued a notification order to Philips Respironics that directed the company to notify its customers of the June 2021 recall. To date, the FDA found that the company’s efforts to notify patients of the recall were “inadequate.”
  • On March 14, 2022, the FDA added information to its FAQs on its website that expressed concern with how Phillips is prioritizing the distribution of replacements to its customers. The first-come first-serve may not adequately address the dangers that some patients face. Some patients may be forced to continue using a dangerous product while they wait for a replacement part to be delivered.

At this point, the FDA is still trying to determine whether Phillips violated the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act or any of its implementing regulations. The FDA has already conducted an inspection, and it is reviewing the results of the inspection.

None of this bodes well for Phillips in its attempts to defend against the growing number of lawsuits filed by people who were injured by its sleep apnea CPAP and BiPAP machines. There is mounting evidence that the company knew about these defects for years and did nothing to recall the product from the market until the company had a new line of products ready to go.

Call a Phillips Sleep Apnea Lawsuit Attorney

If you or a loved one have been using a Phillips Respironics sleep apnea machine and have sustained the injuries described above, you may be entitled to financial compensation. Hundreds of people have been filing product liability lawsuits against Phillips, and evidence is emerging that Phillips knew about this issue for years. Call the attorneys at Blizzard Law at (866) 560‑1867 or contact us online to schedule your free initial consultation.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail
https://www.blizzardlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/a-woman-sleeping-with-anti-snoring-chin-strap-2021-08-26-23-57-03-utc-scaled.jpeg 1709 2560 damg https://www.blizzardlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/logo-blizzard-law-pllc-2-300x92.png damg2022-04-14 20:08:062022-04-14 20:08:34Phillips Cannot Seem to Get its Sleep Apnea Recall Right

CATEGORIES

  • Articles
  • Dangerous Drugs
  • Defective Devices
  • DWI
  • Hurricane Harvey Claims
  • Medical Malpractice
  • News
  • Personal Injury
  • Uncategorized

Recent Post

  • Hotel Owner to Pay Nearly $1 Million in Attempted Sexual Assault of Hotel Guest February 2, 2023
  • Annual Christmas send off party at JFK Elementary School in Houston December 21, 2022
  • Blizzard Law Attorneys Earn Best Lawyers in America Recognition  August 19, 2022
  • Blizzard Law Firm’s $44M Court Win Nabs No. 1 Ranking on Texas Lawyer’s Top Verdicts List for 2021 August 11, 2022
  • Blizzard Law files lawsuit on behalf of local student against a DoubleTree by Hilton hotel in North Austin May 19, 2022
  • Phillips Cannot Seem to Get its Sleep Apnea Recall Right April 14, 2022
  • Blizzard Law PLLC has filed a lawsuit on behalf of I.R. against Rice University for sexual abuse of a child. February 27, 2022
  • Update on the Phillips CPAP Product Defect Lawsuit February 21, 2022

WHAT PEOPLE SAY

I cannot say enough good things about my experience with Blizzard Law! As an out-of-state client, I was skeptical about obtaining first-rate representation for my sexual assault case. After my first meeting with Anna and Ed I knew I was in the right hands… ”

Kathleen Dawson blizzard law five stars

I am beyond grateful that Blizzard Law represented me, and specifically Anna Greenberg who guided and supported me through my journey. My case was unique and involved multiple parties and needed innovative, meticulous, and empathetic minds. I am confident that there is not a better team that could have fought my case, or any type of sexual assault case….”

H.M.blizzard law five stars
ALL TESTIMONIALS
Top Houston Litigation Attorneys

LET US KNOW ABOUT YOUR CASE

CALL US
800-349-0127 | 713-844-3750

CONTACT US MEET THE LAWYERS

ABOUT BLIZZARD LAW

Blizzard Law PLLC was founded by trial lawyers who wanted to take the skill and knowledge gained from representing large corporations and insurance companies and use it for the benefit of individuals injured by defective drugs and products.

QUICK LINK

Our Firm

Attorneys

Blog

Articles

Contact

PARTNER LOGO


CONTACT

5020 Montrose Blvd, Ste 410
Houston, TX 77006

LATEST NEWS

  • Hotel Owner to Pay Nearly $1 Million in Attempted Sexual Assault of Hotel GuestFebruary 2, 2023 - 9:50 pm
  • Blizzard Law Attorneys Earn Best Lawyers in America Recognition August 19, 2022 - 9:11 pm
  • Blizzard Law Firm’s $44M Court Win Nabs No. 1 Ranking on Texas Lawyer’s Top Verdicts List for 2021August 11, 2022 - 2:41 pm
  • Blizzard Law files lawsuit on behalf of local student against a DoubleTree by Hilton hotel in North AustinMay 19, 2022 - 7:18 pm
Disclaimer: This is an advertisement. This web site is designed for general informational purposes only. This information or contacting me through this website does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Legal Marketing Solutions by USAttorneys.com
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • AREAS SERVED
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • DISCLAIMER
Blizzard Law PLLC has filed a lawsuit on behalf of I.R. against Rice University... Blizzard Law files lawsuit on behalf of local student against a DoubleTree by...
Scroll to top