• Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Tiktok
  • TESTIMONIALS
  • BLOG
  • ARTICLES
Call us: 800-349-0127
Blizzard Greenberg PLLC
  • Home
  • Our Firm ▼
    • Attorneys
    • Testimonials
  • Practice Areas ▼
    • ◂ Personal Injury
      • 18-Wheeler Accidents
      • Industrial Accidents
      • Maritime Accidents
      • Wrongful Death
      • Workplace Injuries
    • ◂ Dangerous Drugs
      • Talcum Powder
      • Valsartan
    • ◂ Defective Devices
      • CPAP Recall Cancer Lawsuit
      • Hernia Mesh
      • IVC Filters
      • Minimally Invasive Brain Surgery
      • Transvaginal Mesh
    • ◂ Sexual Assault
      • Hotel Sexual Assault
      • Uber/Lyft Sexual Assault Victims Lawyers
      • Massage Therapy Sexual Assault Lawyers
      • Church Sexual Assault Lawyers
      • School Sexual Assault Lawyers
      • Sexual Assault Resources
    • ◂ Human Trafficking
      • Human Trafficking Resources
  • News
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Menu Menu
Medical Device Approval Process

The FDA Medical Device Approval Process

August 31, 2015/in Defective Devices /by e.blizzard

According to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), more than 200,000 people are injured and as many as 2,000 are killed every year due to incidents linked to defective medical devices, such as hip and knee replacements, implants, transvaginal mesh, and contraceptive devices. In a great number of these cases, the risks are great enough that they may outweigh the potential benefits of the device, which is something patients must be aware of, if they are to be expected to make reasonable decisions regarding the use of these devices.

Over the last several years, there have been numerous reports suggesting that the FDA is placing patients at greater risk by approving many potentially invasive medical devices with roughly the same criteria that they use to approve crutches, wheelchairs, and hospital beds, which is essentially none. According to some reports, most of the moderate- to high-risk medical devices approved by the FDA in recent years did not include any sort of publicly-available scientific evidence or data that could be used to verify their efficacy and safety, even though the law requires that manufacturers of high-risk devices provide such evidence prior to approval, and that the FDA make the information publicly available.

Medical Devices

The FDA uses three categories to classify medical devices according to risk. Class I devices include such low risk medical devices such as bandages, tongue depressors and arms legs, while Class II devices, which pose a moderate risk to patients include syringes, surgical instruments and hearing aids. Class III devices are considered high risk medical devices and are supposed to be subject to much greater scrutiny than Class I or Class II devices.

Unfortunately, too often high-risk Class III medical devices are being reviewed and approved by the FDA using a 510(k) process, which is a streamlined process that is supposedly meant to be used to approve Class I and Class II devices. However, manufacturers have apparently found a loophole of sorts. In order to qualify for a 510(k)  review, the device manufacturers simply have to demonstrate that the new device is “substantially equivalent” to another device already on the market. The problem with this is, once one device is approved using this method, it becomes a “predictive” device that future 510(k) submissions can use as a reference point, which means a great many high-risk Class III devices are being approved by the FDA under the same standards as those reserved for lower-risk Class II devices, which means they’re less stringent, faster and far less expensive, all of which are good for manufacturers, but not so much for patients, since no proof of either effectiveness or safety is even necessary on the streamlined submission.

This is no small problem. According to a 2011 study published by a health research group, between 2005 and 2009, 113 medical devices were subject to recall and 80 of those made it to the market through the 510(k) process. Despite this record, according to another study in published just last year, between 2008 and 2012, of 50 new devices cleared by the FDA, only eight were actually “substantially equivalent” to devices that were cleared for market and of all previously cleared devices referenced, only about three percent had support through publicly available evidence.

Defective medical devices that are implanted inside the body can result in physical injuries that can sometimes be life-threatening and which can also cause excruciating pain and have a significant negative impact on the quality of life. The trauma often associated with these defective devices can lead to massive unforeseeable medical expenses and economic losses.

Tags: FDA
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail
https://www.blizzardlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/iStock_000037081776_Full.jpg 2848 4288 e.blizzard https://www.blizzardlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Blizzard-Greenberg-HEX-0d266c-for-web-300x111.png e.blizzard2015-08-31 16:19:022019-07-27 21:19:39The FDA Medical Device Approval Process

CATEGORIES

  • Articles
  • Dangerous Drugs
  • Defective Devices
  • DWI
  • Hurricane Harvey Claims
  • Medical Malpractice
  • News
  • Personal Injury
  • Sexual Assault
  • Uncategorized

Recent Post

  • Blizzard Greenberg Partners Named Among Nation’s Top Plaintiff Lawyers March 6, 2025
  • Anna Greenberg Featured on The Dirty Verdict Podcast March 4, 2025
  • Woman Sues Austin Massage Envy for Sexual Assault February 25, 2025
  • Blizzard Greenberg Recognized Again Among Nation’s Best Law Firms November 7, 2024
  • Texas Legal Awards Names Anna Greenberg as Finalist for Influential Woman of the Year August 27, 2024
  • Best Lawyers in America Honors Firm Partners in 2025 Edition August 15, 2024
  • Another Houston-Area Massage Envy Hit with Sexual Assault Lawsuit August 6, 2024
  • Former Employee Sues Massage Envy Over Sexual Assault June 5, 2024

WHAT PEOPLE SAY

Anna and Ed were not just incredible legal advocates, but also pillars of strength and compassion during a difficult era in my life. They made me feel safe and understood, which helped shatter the isolating silence around being a sexual assault victim. They helped turn the tragedy of my life into something that is powerful, leaving me not just with a gigantic settlement, but with a profound sense of healing and justice. I cannot recommend Blizzard Greenberg enough and will forever be grateful!”

M.W.blizzard law five stars

I am beyond grateful that Blizzard Greenberg represented me, and specifically Anna Greenberg who guided and supported me through my journey. My case was unique and involved multiple parties and needed innovative, meticulous, and empathetic minds. I am confident that there is not a better team that could have fought my case, or any type of sexual assault case….”

H.M.blizzard law five stars
ALL TESTIMONIALS
 

LET US KNOW ABOUT YOUR CASE

CALL US
800-349-0127 | 713-844-3750

CONTACT US MEET THE LAWYERS

ABOUT BLIZZARD GREENBERG

Blizzard Greenberg PLLC was founded by trial lawyers who wanted to take the skill and knowledge gained from representing large corporations and insurance companies and use it for the benefit of individuals injured by defective drugs and products.

QUICK LINK

Our Firm

Attorneys

Blog

Articles

Contact


CONTACT

2 Riverway Dr, Suite 1240, Houston, Texas, 77056

Houston

Dallas

Austin

LATEST NEWS

  • Blizzard Greenberg Partners Named Among Nation’s Top Plaintiff LawyersMarch 6, 2025 - 10:41 am
  • Anna Greenberg Featured on The Dirty Verdict PodcastMarch 4, 2025 - 10:38 am
  • Woman Sues Austin Massage Envy for Sexual AssaultFebruary 25, 2025 - 1:56 pm
  • Texas Legal Awards Names Anna Greenberg as Finalist for Influential Woman of the YearAugust 27, 2024 - 3:29 pm
Disclaimer: This is an advertisement. This web site is designed for general informational purposes only. This information or contacting me through this website does not create an attorney-client relationship.
© 2025 Copyright - Blizzard Greenberg PLLC
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Tiktok
  • AREAS SERVED
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • DISCLAIMER
Texas Drivers Are The Third Worst Texas Drivers personal injury case How to Choose the Best Lawyer for Your Personal Injury Case
Scroll to top